• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Photo

Fuji X-Pro 2 specs leaked


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,036 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 05 January 2016 - 11:41 AM

http://photorumors.c...ine/#more-78203


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#2 mst

mst

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,904 posts
  • LocationWesterwald, Germany

Posted 06 January 2016 - 02:53 PM

Looks good. But of course doesn't have that "surprise bonus" anymore which the X-Pro 1 once had.

-- Markus
Editor (Nikon, Leica, Samsung reviews)
photozone.de

#3 JoJu

JoJu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,938 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 06 January 2016 - 03:05 PM

Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.

 

Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?



#4 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,368 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 06 January 2016 - 03:14 PM

Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.

 

Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?

Much better AF than version 1.



#5 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,036 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 15 January 2016 - 06:54 AM

Sorry, not interested. Who needs an optical viewfinder anyway? ;-)


  • chlky0001 likes this
Chief Editor
photozone.de

#6 popo

popo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,334 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:19 AM

Thankfully after having the X100 I've grown out of the Fuji lust, where it also showed me it wasn't OVF I needed most but TTL VF.

Still, the X-Pro1 prices were already low and this can only push them lower for those who still want a play with the hybrid viewfinder.
  • Brightcolours likes this

dA Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.


#7 borisbg

borisbg

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 407 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted 15 February 2016 - 09:17 PM

Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?
I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.

#8 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,368 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 15 February 2016 - 09:33 PM

Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?
I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.

Probably the RAW conversion used?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



© by photozone.de