• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Photo

next PZ lens test report: Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21 dave's clichés

dave's clichés

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,385 posts

Posted 09 February 2016 - 08:16 AM

In-body IS is the future, in-lens IS is the past except maybe for extremely long tele lenses.

 

I thinks so too, but we are now taking photos in the present........

 

 The lack of IS wasn't a panacea for sharpness here though...... 



#22 Rover

Rover

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,352 posts
  • LocationRussia

Posted 09 February 2016 - 08:32 AM

 The lack of IS wasn't a panacea for sharpness here though...... 

True dat!  :D



#23 Hans_N

Hans_N

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 13 February 2016 - 10:37 AM

Klaus,

how dare you to rate a Fuji lens only avarage?

You should have known that could only be a defective lens which has sent you a disappointed Fuji customer.
Fuji lenses are always superior......That said, at least the German Fuji Forum and is upset about your XF16-55 test.

But seriously,
I appreciate your work and am pleased that there is such an independent test site, keep it up.

 

Hans



#24 JoJu

JoJu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,027 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 13 February 2016 - 11:07 AM

Klaus,
.....That said, at least the German Fuji Forum and is upset about your XF16-55 test.

 

Try to catch him. There's a reason he escaped to Australia :ph34r:   :lol:

 

The Forum members could make the effort to read about PZ's rating scale. 3 ★ are "good/average in the true sense". Not that I have an overview about all lenses in this class and their ratings, but I don't think there are a lot of better ones.

 

Edit: After looking at some tests I stand corrected. Most lenses are better than this one  :wacko:

So it was an excellent idea to save the money for it.


Edited by JoJu, 13 February 2016 - 11:13 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



© by photozone.de