• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Photo

new Olympus lenses officially announced


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 19 September 2016 - 09:31 PM

Little news there I guess

 

12mm f/1.2 PRO
https://www.olympus....-2-PRO/Overview

 

30mm f/3.5 - 2.5x magnification!

https://www.olympus....m-F3-5/Overview

 

12-100mm f4 IS PRO

https://www.olympus....IS-PRO/Overview


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#2 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 19 September 2016 - 09:33 PM

Sample images from the 12-100mm f/4 - sharp at 12mm

 

https://www.olympus....O/Sample-Images


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#3 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 19 September 2016 - 09:51 PM

$1200 for the 25mm f1.2.

$1300 for the 12-100mm f4...

$300 for the 30mm f3.5 macro.

 

It is a 1.25x macro lens, not 2.5x magnification (which would be impossible for a 30mm lens). 1.25x is reached at 14mm distance to the subject with the front of the lens.



#4 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 19 September 2016 - 10:04 PM

Ah, so they cheated again with the mag factor


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#5 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 19 September 2016 - 10:06 PM

With the small sensor they have the bragging rights for bigger magnification ON PRINT. But they chose to brag the incorrect way. That is the marketing people for you.



#6 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 01:00 AM

MTFs 12-100mm PRO:

https://www.olympus....aspx?lang=en-AU

 

Impressive for such a beast actually


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#7 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 01:02 AM

MTFs 25mm PRO

https://www.olympus....aspx?lang=en-AU

Not so super-duper IMHO albeit understandable at f/1.2


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#8 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 01:04 AM

MTF 30mm macro

https://www.olympus....aspx?lang=en-AU

 

Good


Chief Editor
photozone.de

#9 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 20 September 2016 - 08:03 AM

The 12-100mm f4 zoom lens focusses much closer at 12mm than at 100mm. Interesting but it can be a bit of a bother (I get the same thing when using my 70-200mm with extension tube).

Olympus puts this 24-200mm f8 FF equivalent lens next to a FF 24-70 f4 + 70-200mm f4 combination. A bit silly.

It is more comparable to the likes of Canon EF-M 18-150mm f3.5-6.3 IS STM which is a 14-120mm f2.8-5 MFT equivalent.

 

The specs show quite a lot of focal length shortening towards minimum focus distance with only 0.21x at 0.45m MFD. A nice lens (focal range and sharpness), shame about the small aperture and high price.

 

The 30mm macro appears to be a very nice little lens, but no mention of any light accessories to help with illumination with the extremely short subject distance to the front of the lens.



#10 Ayoh

Ayoh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 20 September 2016 - 08:16 AM

The 12-100mm f4 zoom lens focusses much closer at 12mm than at 100mm. Interesting but it can be a bit of a bother (I get the same thing when using my 70-200mm with extension tube).

Olympus puts this 24-200mm f8 FF equivalent lens next to a FF 24-70 f4 + 70-200mm f4 combination. A bit silly.

It is more comparable to the likes of Canon EF-M 18-150mm f3.5-6.3 IS STM which is a 14-120mm f2.8-5 MFT equivalent.

 

The specs show quite a lot of focal length shortening towards minimum focus distance with only 0.21x at 0.45m MFD. A nice lens (focal range and sharpness), shame about the small aperture and high price.

 

The 30mm macro appears to be a very nice little lens, but no mention of any light accessories to help with illumination with the extremely short subject distance to the front of the lens.

 

The olympus marketeers really do love their contrived BS comparison to 35mm equivalents, I hope the major review sites pull them up on it and remind the audience that the important equivalent aperture parameter has been intentionally omitted. Anyway Im sure this has been discussed many times before :-) Looks like a nice lens otherwise, but not for me. 3:2 full frame is difficult to give up once you get used to the quality



#11 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 09:31 AM

So the 12-100mm extends when zooming ... :-/

https://m.youtube.co...h?v=JvwQBAsBNRM
Chief Editor
photozone.de

#12 Ayoh

Ayoh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 20 September 2016 - 09:40 AM

So the 12-100mm extends when zooming ... :-/

https://m.youtube.co...h?v=JvwQBAsBNRM

Ironically that video has terrible CA, you would think they would get that right



#13 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 20 September 2016 - 10:06 AM

Indeed, I wonder what they used to film that guy. The green CA is at a level I have not seen before in any video, I think.

I like the "how does Olympus do it?" part.. The real answer being: using a small sensor, and making the lens an FF f8 equivalent.

 

It indeed extends a lot for a 100mm lens. It is not even that high a magnification zoom lens, but rather quite normal magnification. My 70-200mm reaches the similar magnification, but at 1.2m MFD, for instance. The EF-M lens I mentioned above reaches 0.31x at 45mm.

 

While the announced E-M1 Mark II has some very impressive features, the Olympus talk about this lens is like from a parallel universe. 

 

1.5cm distance from the lens for easy macro shooting? Without built in lights?



#14 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 10:30 AM

Still an awesome travel lens ... except that the Leica 12-60mm may win me over instead ;-)
Chief Editor
photozone.de

#15 Klaus

Klaus

    Chief Editor

  • Moderators
  • 5,414 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 20 September 2016 - 10:32 AM

The Oly 25 has a surprisingly good bokeh (sample shots at dpreview).
Chief Editor
photozone.de

#16 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 20 September 2016 - 10:34 AM

Yes, it is a good travel lens. There are many good travel lenses, though.



#17 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 20 September 2016 - 10:38 AM

The Oly 25 has a surprisingly good bokeh (sample shots at dpreview).

Yes, it renders nicely. The flares and veiling, on the other hand, are not that nice.



#18 you2

you2

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,000 posts

Posted 20 September 2016 - 12:57 PM

If you make comments like this then I think you need to also consider the rendering and resolving power of the lenses. I suspect the 18-150 canon is not near the same resolving power of the 12-100 but perhaps you know differently.

The 12-100mm f4 zoom lens focusses much closer at 12mm than at 100mm. Interesting but it can be a bit of a bother (I get the same thing when using my 70-200mm with extension tube).

Olympus puts this 24-200mm f8 FF equivalent lens next to a FF 24-70 f4 + 70-200mm f4 combination. A bit silly.

It is more comparable to the likes of Canon EF-M 18-150mm f3.5-6.3 IS STM which is a 14-120mm f2.8-5 MFT equivalent.

 

The specs show quite a lot of focal length shortening towards minimum focus distance with only 0.21x at 0.45m MFD. A nice lens (focal range and sharpness), shame about the small aperture and high price.

 

The 30mm macro appears to be a very nice little lens, but no mention of any light accessories to help with illumination with the extremely short subject distance to the front of the lens.



#19 Brightcolours

Brightcolours

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 20 September 2016 - 01:41 PM

you2, I was specifically talking about equivalent lenses, not about how sharp a lens is or is not (in the part that you seem to have an issue with). Nor about weather sealing, the $500 Canon is not weather sealed and the $1300 Olympus is.

 

But yeah, do we know how the "resolving power" of the $1300 Olympus is? The 12mm sample image is not that amazingly sharp near the edge, and it is stopped down one stop. But we don't know, as it is not tested yet. Neither do we know of the new Canon I mentioned.

 

Can we have an idea of how the EF-M 18-150mm will perform anyway? Yes, we can. 

Photozone found the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS STM to perform pretty well:

http://www.opticalli...56stmis?start=1

 

From the published MTF charts we can tell that the new EF-M 18-150mm will be sharper at 150mm than that EF-S lens at 135mm:

 

EF-S 18-135mm MTF:

mtf.png

EF-M 18-150mm MTF:

mtf.png

 

So, you should not be too worried about its resolving power, it should to be alright.



#20 thxbb12

thxbb12

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 588 posts
  • LocationGeneva, Switzerland

Posted 20 September 2016 - 07:32 PM

Robin Wong has a blog entry about the Oly 25mm f1.2 with many images here: https://robinwong.bl...ens-review.html

 

The rendering is indeed quite nice, but the lens is huge. The Pany 25 f1.4 is tiny in comparison... albeit not close in IQ.


--Florent

Flickr Page





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



© by photozone.de