I wonder what the improvements over the version one are? Or is it one of those "Silver ring added for a touch of luuuxury!" updates?
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 USM L IS II review coming ...
Posted 21 November 2016 - 02:33 PM
Posted 22 November 2016 - 11:11 PM
Focus shift ... isn't helping ...
Posted 23 November 2016 - 10:42 AM
Posted 23 November 2016 - 11:16 AM
I'm beginning to suspect that the lens is defective.
Then TDP also had a defective unit?
Posted 23 November 2016 - 11:58 AM
I've a hard time to believe that the lens is that bad.
I can see a certain centering issue specifically at 105mm but it's not too bad by normal standards.
The outer field is worse than on the mk 1 there.
Posted 23 November 2016 - 11:29 PM
So at photographyblog the results are as bad (interpolated from their 5D IV results).
Posted 24 November 2016 - 12:11 AM
Posted 24 November 2016 - 07:13 AM
Between this and DPReview's *ahem* less than enthusiastic review of the Sigma 12-24 Art, looks like the testing business has not been all roses and candy lately...
Posted 24 November 2016 - 07:46 AM
Manufacturers need to keep the testers awake and kicking. Bad headlines are better than no headlines. With bad headlines the *cough* fanboys are willing to defend their decisions which always gives a view, that not all is crap from a certain manufacturer.
Posted 24 November 2016 - 08:18 AM
Posted 25 November 2016 - 02:45 AM
2nd sample .... massive back-focusing ...
Took a quick shot this morning. The focus indicator was way beyond infinity ...
Not that it overly matters for the formal lab test.
Posted 25 November 2016 - 09:26 AM
Well, I will try to compensate that via AF micro-adjust tonight. Let's see how it goes ...
Posted 25 November 2016 - 12:19 PM
I believe Canon does not use hard stops at infinity for USM lenses. They claim that focus is reached when you over shoot the focus then back off. Even most MF lenses go beyond infinity. A hard stop at infinity is very nice to have though. My EF 50/1.8 Mark I hard stops at infinity. It is not USM. Neither is the EF 50/1.4 (although it does say ultrasonic on it). I wonder if it has the infinity hard stop?
Posted 25 November 2016 - 02:20 PM
Focusing beyond infinity makes sense due to thermal effects on the glass.
But not that much.
The 2nd sample isn't really better ...
Posted 25 November 2016 - 06:14 PM
So can we safely say the new lens is a turd?
Get a Sigma...
The Sigma has already been tested in both Nikon and Canon mounts (though obviously not on the 5DSR).
Posted 27 November 2016 - 03:44 PM
How much % of new lenses suffer from this centering defect? You hear it quite often, I myself had the same problem years ago with the 70-200mm F/4.0 L (non-IS). I send it to the Canon repair centre, here in the Netherlands and they said it was fine. Which is was most definitely not.
So, how come the experts at Canon just don't see it?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users