• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Photo

Well...


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#41 JoJu

JoJu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,719 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 30 January 2017 - 12:07 PM

Apparently you were just a bit too ecstatic? Or are the double lateral CA?
 

Unlike lateral lateral CAs


Anyway, the review makes me think a lot. Tooooo bad, it's only so good on a dated D3x  :P

 

Now, I need to ask: How many stars you would give to a lense like that being an APO and coming along without bokeh fringing? 6? 5 1/2?

 

By using all stars for a lense which leaves still a bit to wish for, you went to the end of the scale, meaning "Manufacturers, it's pointless to try better - we ran out of stars" 

 

edit: I just checked on lensscore.org: They rate lenses independently from camera sensors.

 

Otus 85/1.4: 1459 points

Nikon 105/1.4: 1044 points

 

40% more performance would be just a 7 star rating, hope you have some leftovers.  :)

 

edit 2: Here comes the grain of salt: The very same lenscore gave 1000 points to the Nikon 85/1.4G. Which I already doubted and now even more, after looking at the single categories and in each of them that lense scores exactly also 1000 points. No way.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



© by photozone.de