Better than any other 135mm on the market today and much better than the old (but venerable) Canon 135 f2:
Posted 18 April 2017 - 01:59 PM
Posted 18 April 2017 - 08:18 PM
I'll take the Canon, thanks.
Much cheaper, MUCH smaller and lighter, much better resale value if needed.
I wouldn't call the Canon much smaller: same length and 1cm less thick:
The Sigma is quite a bit heavier however: 1130g vs 750g
At $1400 vs $1000 the Sigma is 30% more expensive. Considering it's just been released, its larger aperture and the much better IQ, I think a 30% premium is well justified.
Posted 19 April 2017 - 08:08 AM
Sometimes we confuse me. By starting multiple threads for the same item ("rumors about lens Y" " Y has arrived in the lab" "first samples of Y" "test results of Y"), so for this thread here I just quote myself so I'm sure to agree. At least a bit
Ah, indeed Joju, I had forgotten about that thread. It would have made more sense if I had posted my original message there!
Posted 19 April 2017 - 08:42 AM
No problem, didn't happen the first time and will not have happened the last.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users