Sigma 120-300mm 2,8
#1
Posted 28 March 2011 - 03:19 PM
I am thinking about getting the end of production Sigma 120-300mm 2,8 HSM. When I looked the lens up i found some links to photozone but the link does not work anymore.
Does anyone remember the test.? Or has a working link?
http://www.photozone...00_28/index.htm
Thanks
#2
Posted 28 March 2011 - 03:21 PM
Hi there
I am thinking about getting the end of production Sigma 120-300mm 2,8 HSM. When I looked the lens up i found some links to photozone but the link does not work anymore.
Does anyone remember the test.? Or has a working link?
http://www.photozone...00_28/index.htm
Thanks
We withdrew the review after having recognized that the degree of decentering wasn't really acceptable.
photozone.de
#3
Posted 28 March 2011 - 03:38 PM
We withdrew the review after having recognized that the degree of decentering wasn't really acceptable.
hmm, any chance of sending me the lenstest by email anyway? I handle it with care ;-)
What would be your gutt feeling, the 120-300mm2,8 over the 100-300mm 4,0 for wildlife?
Thanks
#4
Posted 28 March 2011 - 03:47 PM
I'm concidering the new one, if it's not too expensive, though expensive I'm sure it will be.Hi there
I am thinking about getting the end of production Sigma 120-300mm 2,8 HSM. When I looked the lens up i found some links to photozone but the link does not work anymore.
Does anyone remember the test.? Or has a working link?
http://www.photozone...00_28/index.htm
Thanks
Arctic Exposure
#7
Posted 28 March 2011 - 03:57 PM
hmm, any chance of sending me the lenstest by email anyway? I handle it with care ;-)
What would be your gutt feeling, the 120-300mm2,8 over the 100-300mm 4,0 for wildlife?
Thanks
Just use the "way back machine" ...
http://replay.waybac...00_28/index.htm
photozone.de
#10
Posted 28 March 2011 - 05:33 PM
We'll see what happens when it becomes available for K-mount here in Norway2500EUR is quite reasonable for such a lens I think. Still expensive in absolute terms, of course.
I have the 60-250mm f/4, and I'm very happy with what it delivers, but I would like a bit shallower DoF at times, and a longer reach. And I had the DA* 50-150mm f/2.8 before, and that was a great lens as well, so I'm considering switching the 60-250mm with a 50-135+120-300mm. Also, from what I've read about, and seen from the old 120-300mm (the one before the new OS version), it was very good with a 2x converter as well, so hopefully the new will be at least as good. Then I have a very versatile kit with 2.8 from 16 to 300, with a possibility for 600mm with 5.6, and AF all the way.
Arctic Exposure
#11
Posted 28 March 2011 - 05:42 PM
Hmmm... Klaus: that link just brought up "known malicious web site" report from Norton Internet Security. Safe?Just use the "way back machine" ...
http://replay.waybac...00_28/index.htm
Ian
#12
Posted 28 March 2011 - 06:09 PM
Hmmm... Klaus: that link just brought up "known malicious web site" report from Norton Internet Security. Safe?
Ian
The waybackmachine is a non-profit organization.
Maybe try the direct link:
http://waybackmachine.org/
and then enter
http://www.photozone...00_28/index.htm
photozone.de
#13
Posted 28 March 2011 - 11:18 PM
Yes, safe. The Wayback Machine is a safe website. And a very good oneHmmm... Klaus: that link just brought up "known malicious web site" report from Norton Internet Security. Safe?
Ian
Arctic Exposure
#14
Posted 29 March 2011 - 12:31 AM
The waybackmachine is a non-profit organization.
Maybe try the direct link:
http://waybackmachine.org/
and then enter
http://www.photozone...00_28/index.htm
Brilliant, thanks both..!Yes, safe. The Wayback Machine is a safe website. And a very good one
NIS seems to have that wrong.
Ian
#15
Posted 29 March 2011 - 08:03 AM
Ha, I knew there was a Sigma 50-500 review on PZ a few years ago! I thought I'm imagining things when I've tried looking for it recently and couldn't find itJust use the "way back machine" ...
http://replay.waybac...00_28/index.htm
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











