![]() |
New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Nikon (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX (/showthread.php?tid=1139) Pages:
1
2
|
New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Rover - 07-01-2015 New Nikon gear is rumored: 500/4 E FL VR, 600/4 E FL VR, and 16-80/2.8-4.0 E DX VR. Of course, only the latter is of any interest to us, and it's rumored to cost $900. Availability July 16th (in Japan). Good that Nikon finally took notice of the Sony DT 16-80/3.5-4.5 and decided to do something similar - and better - instead of the mundane 3.5-5.6 version. Any thoughts? ![]() (compared to the existing 16-85/3.5-5.6) New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Klaus - 07-01-2015 Well, things are getting more complicated the faster you make them. So it'll be interesting whether they can keep the quality. New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - JJ_SO - 07-01-2015 It'll be interesting to see how this compares to the Sigma 17-70/2.8-4 Contemporary. A little bit less range vs a bit more customization - for those willing to spend some time with the USB-dock. Fluorine coating, Nano crystal, electromagnetic diaphragm on Nikon side, minimal distance 22 cm on Sigma side and at half the price... New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Brightcolours - 07-02-2015 $1,069.95. Weighs 480 grams. 72mm filter thread. 17 elements in 13 groups. 24-120mm f4.2-6 full frame equivalent. The AF-S 24-120mm f4 VR for FF costs $1299.95, weighs 710 grams, has a 77mm filter thread and also 17 elements in 13 groups. All in all, to me the price seems a tad elevated. 16-80mm f2.8-4 DX: ![]() AF-S 24-120mm f4: ![]() New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Rover - 07-02-2015 Yeah, pretty similar construction overall (except the layout of the seven elements towards the rear). But fast APS-C zooms have always been pretty expensive, think the 17-55. The 24-120 didn't seem that great on the long end per Markus's review anyways. New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Brightcolours - 07-02-2015 Quote:Yeah, pretty similar construction overall (except the layout of the seven elements towards the rear). But fast APS-C zooms have always been pretty expensive, think the 17-55. The 24-120 didn't seem that great on the long end per Markus's review anyways.A constant aperture lens is a bit more expensive to design. Weight is to a certain extent a good measure for price. The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 weighs 645 grams. The Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 weighs 755 grams. With 480 grams the new lens is a light weight in comparison... New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Klaus - 07-02-2015 At max. aperture it is slightly worse than the 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6. However, I reckon that it is better at comparable apertures. New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - JJ_SO - 07-02-2015 Do you plan to review the new Contemporary version of the already reviewed 17-70/2.8-4 macro OS some day or are the differences just too small to justify another test procedure? The optical quality appears to be close to the Nikkor 16-85 New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - Brightcolours - 07-02-2015 Quote:Do you plan to review the new Contemporary version of the already reviewed 17-70/2.8-4 macro OS some day or are the differences just too small to justify another test procedure? The optical quality appears to be close to the Nikkor 16-85The optics are a new design. Old 17-70mm OS: ![]() ![]() ![]() New 17-70mm OS "C": ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So, the differences are not small. New Nikon lenses including 16-80/2.8-4.0 DX - mst - 07-06-2015 Quote:Do you plan to review the new Contemporary version of the already reviewed 17-70/2.8-4 macro OS some dayDone already ![]() http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/822-sigma1770284os -- Markus |