![]() |
Well... - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Nikon (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Well... (/showthread.php?tid=430) |
Well... - mst - 01-21-2017 ... I hope you don't mind some teasing, but it seems we have a 5-star review coming up ![]() -- Markus Well... - JJ_SO - 01-22-2017 Sigma 85/1.4 Art? ^_^ Well... - borisbg - 01-22-2017 We love teasing... and we also like clues. Well... - davidmanze - 01-22-2017 Hmmm 5 stars huh? Well... - davidmanze - 01-22-2017 Of course of all your reviews are five star Markus...... :o Hmmm.... either it's the new AF-S 105mm F1.4, or it's the new Nikor AF-S 70-200 F2.8E... or even better, in a magnificent "call of duty" effort you've bitten the bullet and are doing comparison review the Nikor AF-S 200-500mm vs the G2 vs the Sigma contemporary..... It could be my wishful thinking of course! Well... - mst - 01-22-2017 Haha, well, it's probably safe to assume that it's not a zoom lens... sorry, dave ![]() -- Markus Well... - JJ_SO - 01-22-2017 None of them are 5★, dave. :lol: okay, about the 105... maybe, since some reviewers praise it as close to 200/2, but even that gets only 4 ½★ Do you remember any Nikon glass lately tested which comes away with 5★ (I like this star shortcut, that's all ^_^ ) Well... - mst - 01-22-2017 Well, the 200/2 was really close to 5 stars (it got them on the D200), it's extremely sharp in the center, but not insanely great across the whole frame (still great, but not _insanely_ great). Plus, the flare... Sorry, JoJu, didn't reply to your first guess: nope, it's not a Sigma ![]() -- Markus Well... - Klaus - 01-22-2017 Well, we don't know about the Sigma yet ... ;-) Well... - mst - 01-22-2017 Oh, yes, true... ![]() -- Markus |