Well... - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Nikon (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Well... (/showthread.php?tid=430) |
Well... - JJ_SO - 01-30-2017 Apparently you were just a bit too ecstatic? Or are the double lateral CA? Quote:Unlike lateral lateral CAs Anyway, the review makes me think a lot. Tooooo bad, it's only so good on a dated D3x Now, I need to ask: How many stars you would give to a lense like that being an APO and coming along without bokeh fringing? 6? 5 1/2? By using all stars for a lense which leaves still a bit to wish for, you went to the end of the scale, meaning "Manufacturers, it's pointless to try better - we ran out of stars" edit: I just checked on lensscore.org: They rate lenses independently from camera sensors. Otus 85/1.4: 1459 points Nikon 105/1.4: 1044 points 40% more performance would be just a 7 star rating, hope you have some leftovers. edit 2: Here comes the grain of salt: The very same lenscore gave 1000 points to the Nikon 85/1.4G. Which I already doubted and now even more, after looking at the single categories and in each of them that lense scores exactly also 1000 points. No way. |