Nikon Neglect? - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Nikon (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Nikon Neglect? (/showthread.php?tid=4569) |
RE: Nikon Neglect? - davidmanze - 11-18-2019 (11-18-2019, 09:31 PM)JJ_SO Wrote: I know one pro who sold his 50 mm S lens because he was very unhappy with the bokeh. And I'm not using my 50 mm Art enough to double it. I guess I'm not rubbing shoulders with the upper echelon lenses .... having the 85mm F1.8D ( I find Optrex helps ) ..... so I have less demanding criteria. .... and once you corrected the distortions on the Samyang 14mm F2.8 it doubles as a medium tele-photo .... but you get used to it RE: Nikon Neglect? - Brightcolours - 11-19-2019 Indeed more uncorrected than one would expect, but not Sony or Olympus level of uncorrected. Or, indeed, we can now say Canon level of uncorrected (that RF 24-240mm f4-6.3 IS USM): [attachment=66] Left is uncorrected at 24mm, right is what you see in the EVF, in JPG and corrected RAW in DPP. Not bad, a free 24mm f4 fisheye lens for free with your 24-240mm super zoom. |