11-21-2011, 10:57 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1321872656' post='13093']
I do not see what is so bad about 36mp. Only downside will be the file sizes who get bigger and bigger.
I think this means that Canon and Nikon are going the same route: The 1D X having a lower MP count than the 5D mk III, the D4 having a lower mp count than the D800. One robust fast professional model with great low light ability, one geared more towards studio/landscape and semi-pro.
Makes more sense than the D700/D3 doing the same thing?
[/quote]
Frankly, tonality, pixel-level sharpness and DR are my #1 Priorities.
If this means 6mp that would be Ok for me. You can, of course, argue that I could get just that by downsizing but what is the point of extra processing steps.
Your mileage may vary, of course.
I do not see what is so bad about 36mp. Only downside will be the file sizes who get bigger and bigger.
I think this means that Canon and Nikon are going the same route: The 1D X having a lower MP count than the 5D mk III, the D4 having a lower mp count than the D800. One robust fast professional model with great low light ability, one geared more towards studio/landscape and semi-pro.
Makes more sense than the D700/D3 doing the same thing?
[/quote]
Frankly, tonality, pixel-level sharpness and DR are my #1 Priorities.
If this means 6mp that would be Ok for me. You can, of course, argue that I could get just that by downsizing but what is the point of extra processing steps.
Your mileage may vary, of course.