[quote name='mst' timestamp='1325768692' post='14334']
Most likely a 1/1.5" sensor, so not really big. Crop factor should be around 4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format
-- Markus
[/quote]
I did wonder that, but there doesn't seem to be that size listed as existing (not to say there isn't one) and also, there was no "1/" prefixed and there are other inch sizes without such too.
In the case this is the case, a 4x CF would probably make this much less interesting to most, and even less of "an answer to mirrorless" some are claiming it as. It would be just another high end compact to join the many already there.
Most likely a 1/1.5" sensor, so not really big. Crop factor should be around 4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format
-- Markus
[/quote]
I did wonder that, but there doesn't seem to be that size listed as existing (not to say there isn't one) and also, there was no "1/" prefixed and there are other inch sizes without such too.
In the case this is the case, a 4x CF would probably make this much less interesting to most, and even less of "an answer to mirrorless" some are claiming it as. It would be just another high end compact to join the many already there.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.