[Brightcolours]

Brightcolours, go as you please by trying to put my words in a sense I never was talking about. I talked about shooting landscapes at f/1.4. I was NOT comparing 35 against 50mm

You brought in the Sigma 35mm in a thread about a 58mm lens. I did not put any words into your mouth. And uhmm.. 35mm f1,4 has quite a bit smaller aperture than 58mm at f1.4. So they are not even comparable in that respect.

 

And if you're not happy with the bokeh or with the focal lengths the 35, that's a matter of taste. Not for saying "you're wrong", because there's no wrong or right in taste, but when DigitalRev TV aka Kai Wong asked the subscribers which bokeh the liked most when comparing Sigma, Nikon and Canon 35, they voted for Sigma. Whatever that means...

It means absolutely nothing, as Kai Wong only showed an image which showed highlights through a tree foliage and called it a bokeh test. Oh well. Other people say that the Nikon has nicer bokeh. Does this matter in a thread about a 58mm lens? No.

And for "correcting" LoCA: I'm no fan of correcting bad lenses by software as there's always a loss of quality. Plus more unnecessary work in post.

Nonsense, LoCA correction or LoCA masking does not mean loss of quality. Don't know how you get to that conclusion. LaCA correction even means increase of quality. 

Distortion correction does mean a loss of resolution, but we were not talking about distortion.

 

My point was that LoCA is easily maskable, but bokeh is how it is.