08-05-2012, 02:04 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1344106716' post='19684']
The Panasonic 12-35mm has a "RAW" distortion of 5.8% at 12mm.
Honestly speaking I just don't understand what Panasonic is thinking here. This is a 1200EUR lens for god's sake.
[/quote]
It is small.
Seems that almost all lenses are design that way now. Look at RAW files of the Sony RX100. This looks like a fisheye:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readfl...d=42181127
The Oly 12/2,0 has RAW distortion of 5,4% according to your tests, too. And this is a prime lens and it isn't cheap either.
How is the center and corner resolution in jpg / RAW of the 12-35 @12mm and F2,8 and F5,6?
Would be very interesting to know how much resolution you have to give up for distortion correction.
Martin
The Panasonic 12-35mm has a "RAW" distortion of 5.8% at 12mm.
Honestly speaking I just don't understand what Panasonic is thinking here. This is a 1200EUR lens for god's sake.
[/quote]
It is small.
Seems that almost all lenses are design that way now. Look at RAW files of the Sony RX100. This looks like a fisheye:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readfl...d=42181127
The Oly 12/2,0 has RAW distortion of 5,4% according to your tests, too. And this is a prime lens and it isn't cheap either.
How is the center and corner resolution in jpg / RAW of the 12-35 @12mm and F2,8 and F5,6?
Would be very interesting to know how much resolution you have to give up for distortion correction.
Martin