01-03-2012, 08:35 AM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1325553585' post='14232']
The guys at Pentax are probably smoking some nasty stuff. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Hope that now that they're under Ricoh's control they'll clean their act up. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
Yes, they should have made this one a f/4. They wanted it to make as cheap as possible I suspect. At f/5.6 it makes little sense other than for the usual wow effects of a fisheye.
The guys at Pentax are probably smoking some nasty stuff. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Hope that now that they're under Ricoh's control they'll clean their act up. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />[/quote]
Yes, they should have made this one a f/4. They wanted it to make as cheap as possible I suspect. At f/5.6 it makes little sense other than for the usual wow effects of a fisheye.