01-03-2012, 07:33 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1325579726' post='14241']
Yes, they should have made this one a f/4. They wanted it to make as cheap as possible I suspect. At f/5.6 it makes little sense other than for the usual wow effects of a fisheye.
[/quote]
The oddest thing is that they're still asking like $200 for it. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
Yes, they should have made this one a f/4. They wanted it to make as cheap as possible I suspect. At f/5.6 it makes little sense other than for the usual wow effects of a fisheye.
[/quote]
The oddest thing is that they're still asking like $200 for it. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />