11-20-2011, 10:22 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1321751762' post='13047']
So, here we go, the first Nikon CX review. The basic kit zoom is a solid performer with no real weaknesses:
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon1/699-...10303556v1
-- Markus
[/quote]
Markus, thanks for the review.
About the VR performance, could it be caused by the shutter? you have started leaning towards this explanation with your electronic shutter test but it would be interesting if you could go further and analyze the blur pattern. At the moment, there is quite some heat on newer panasonic x lenses on fora with clear evidence of such issue - a nervous double image. The first olympus mft 14-42 also suffered from this. All these lenses have in common a very small build with a collabsible design and very lightweight structures.
to think engineers would have missed that??
Greetings,
S.
So, here we go, the first Nikon CX review. The basic kit zoom is a solid performer with no real weaknesses:
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon1/699-...10303556v1
-- Markus
[/quote]
Markus, thanks for the review.
About the VR performance, could it be caused by the shutter? you have started leaning towards this explanation with your electronic shutter test but it would be interesting if you could go further and analyze the blur pattern. At the moment, there is quite some heat on newer panasonic x lenses on fora with clear evidence of such issue - a nervous double image. The first olympus mft 14-42 also suffered from this. All these lenses have in common a very small build with a collabsible design and very lightweight structures.
to think engineers would have missed that??
Greetings,
S.