03-31-2011, 06:05 AM
[quote name='x_holger' timestamp='1301522853' post='7239']
My impresion is that the resolution data has very different characteristics ...
At F0.95 the results are quite comparable and actually pretty good for F0.95 .... but stopped down there is a big difference between the reviews of photozone and optyczne/lenstip. I was just wondering why ... is it a matter of the cameras used, Pana GF-1 vs. Oly E-PL1 or the software used, Photoshop ACR vs. DCRaw ?
Of course it's not a race for the highest figures ... and it's about taking photos anyway, not just figures ...
I use the lens for available light photography and my impression is that the Nokton is really something special in the mFT-world or even in general.
Usable F0.95 for 849 Euros is remarkable.
[/quote]
The margin of error decreases the more you stop down so I doubt that the results are substantially wrong. However, as you mentioned, it is a question of testing parameters. The results are certainly not directly comparable.
I was actually very pleased with the results and also highly tempted to get one for private use. The sample image with the clock looks great for instance despite a little haze (which is normal).
My impresion is that the resolution data has very different characteristics ...
At F0.95 the results are quite comparable and actually pretty good for F0.95 .... but stopped down there is a big difference between the reviews of photozone and optyczne/lenstip. I was just wondering why ... is it a matter of the cameras used, Pana GF-1 vs. Oly E-PL1 or the software used, Photoshop ACR vs. DCRaw ?
Of course it's not a race for the highest figures ... and it's about taking photos anyway, not just figures ...
I use the lens for available light photography and my impression is that the Nokton is really something special in the mFT-world or even in general.
Usable F0.95 for 849 Euros is remarkable.
[/quote]
The margin of error decreases the more you stop down so I doubt that the results are substantially wrong. However, as you mentioned, it is a question of testing parameters. The results are certainly not directly comparable.
I was actually very pleased with the results and also highly tempted to get one for private use. The sample image with the clock looks great for instance despite a little haze (which is normal).