03-20-2011, 02:18 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1300408508' post='6919']
no, you keep focussing on the NUMBERS. Don't do that.... just look at the bars themsleves, in relation to the vertical axis. Not the numbers, but the maximum achievable. The horizontal lines in each graph are meaning the same thing, even if the numbers, for the higher res. sensor, are higher.
So.. the top line is the max achievable. The next line is to what is considered excellent. And so on.Erase the numbers, and just compare the graphs,
[/quote]
The "Rating Scale" for K-5 is missing from the DAL 35/2.4 test, which is causing some confusion.
For example, this is the one for K-20:
![[Image: rating_k10d.gif]](http://www.opticallimits.com/images/8Reviews/lenses/rating_k10d.gif)
But the vertical axis of the new test is still in the 5 divisions that represent [ex/very good/good/fair/poor].
no, you keep focussing on the NUMBERS. Don't do that.... just look at the bars themsleves, in relation to the vertical axis. Not the numbers, but the maximum achievable. The horizontal lines in each graph are meaning the same thing, even if the numbers, for the higher res. sensor, are higher.
So.. the top line is the max achievable. The next line is to what is considered excellent. And so on.Erase the numbers, and just compare the graphs,
[/quote]
The "Rating Scale" for K-5 is missing from the DAL 35/2.4 test, which is causing some confusion.
For example, this is the one for K-20:
But the vertical axis of the new test is still in the 5 divisions that represent [ex/very good/good/fair/poor].