Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX)
#24
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1295531235' post='5684']

Was this the case?[/quote]



Yes <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



[quote name='you2' timestamp='1295531235' post='5684']

If so does the newer versions (which I blindly assume differ) have better resistance to flare?

[/quote]



Honestly: I don't know. I haven't handled the new version. Or even had a chance to compare both side by side.



Optically, they are identical except for the Nano coating. I would expect the newer version to be better in this regard, but still not great. Nano coating helps to reduce flare, but cannot completely eliminate it.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Messages In This Thread
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-18-2011, 04:44 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-18-2011, 09:30 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-19-2011, 01:41 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-19-2011, 01:52 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-19-2011, 05:28 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by genotypewriter - 01-19-2011, 05:39 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR (DX) - by mst - 01-20-2011, 01:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)