Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ Lens Test Report: Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED
[quote name='DavidBM' date='25 June 2010 - 03:50 PM' timestamp='1277473832' post='693']

I understand that, Klaus. My thought was the comparison would be overall fair, because while MFT would get better ca and distortion figures, it would be "paid for" by worse resolution -- so in terms of an overall balance, you would be able to give an overall result based on the measured resolution, ca and distortion which wouldn't be unfair to either side, because while mft would gain from the ca and distortion correction, the other formats would gain from the uninterpolated native resolution, and your overall judgements would reflect the overall results that users could expect from the lenses.


I think the only "fair" approach would be to provide 2 ratings - one for the "native (more or less)" performance and one of the system performance.

However, consequently the efforts would double and I think this is not worth it. Most users will never care about the native performance.

Maybe I should change the "stars" to apples, oranges, strawberries, bananas - one fruit for each system. ;-)

The big question would be - which system gets the "lemon" I suppose ? ;-))

Messages In This Thread
next PZ Lens Test Report: Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED - by Klaus - 06-25-2010, 01:55 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)