09-30-2019, 06:14 AM
"Looking through a viewfinder" is nothing else like "sitting in a car with a modern windscreen display" and not turning the ignition key.
These EVFs are not made to impress daves, they are made to work with them. I was always impressed until 2 years ago how bad they were. Today the only thing what should impress me "they are as good as OVF" which don't impress ME anymore. And using the EVF-only features makes me NOT wish for an OVF, it just means I don't see the OVF as worse - as long as I don't need focus peaking, light amplification in dark situations, checking if I use the proper WB, or simply enlarging the focus area I'm pointing at. By looking through it only and then coming up with this verdict, I doubt your intention to not start another OVF crusade. "It didn't look real" is such a bs - as if an OVF looks real to the point something looks without any camera finder.
What did you expect? Dancing seagulls pointing their wings towards to focus points? Or was it maybe more the fact that you're used the sight of the 150-600 through your APS-C body, so you missed some details? What did you expect, what did you miss?
These EVFs are not made to impress daves, they are made to work with them. I was always impressed until 2 years ago how bad they were. Today the only thing what should impress me "they are as good as OVF" which don't impress ME anymore. And using the EVF-only features makes me NOT wish for an OVF, it just means I don't see the OVF as worse - as long as I don't need focus peaking, light amplification in dark situations, checking if I use the proper WB, or simply enlarging the focus area I'm pointing at. By looking through it only and then coming up with this verdict, I doubt your intention to not start another OVF crusade. "It didn't look real" is such a bs - as if an OVF looks real to the point something looks without any camera finder.
What did you expect? Dancing seagulls pointing their wings towards to focus points? Or was it maybe more the fact that you're used the sight of the 150-600 through your APS-C body, so you missed some details? What did you expect, what did you miss?