12-18-2019, 05:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2019, 07:47 AM by Brightcolours.)
The Fuji is not in the same league, the Sigma also is an exception, and the Fuji is comparable to 52mm f2.1 in FF terms. Is that what you gotta tell us?
The Fuji "52mm f2.1" 35mm f1.4 is a bit heavier, a bit bigger, a lot more expensive than an equivalent faster Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM. So not the best case study for Fuji APS-C vs FF? Especially when you consider the bad border resolution results the Fuji gets, even compared an ancient design like that of the EF 50mm f1.8 STM.
The Fuji "52mm f2.1" 35mm f1.4 is a bit heavier, a bit bigger, a lot more expensive than an equivalent faster Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM. So not the best case study for Fuji APS-C vs FF? Especially when you consider the bad border resolution results the Fuji gets, even compared an ancient design like that of the EF 50mm f1.8 STM.