[mst]

"Other than"? But that's the entire point! The optical viewfinder is very important to some - and EVFs don't quite work.
And - we're talking about a less complex DSLR configuration (because you'd no longer need dedicated AF and metering systems) while being able to match MILCs spec by spec (including AF coverage).

You don't have to explain that to me. I made it very clear several times that I prefer optical viewfinders myself. So please stop accusing me of things I haven't said. You're mixing up many things here. I personally would prefer to stay with a DSLR. It's however simply not where the market is going. That's why I consider DSLRs a dead-end road. From a market perspective.

If you disagree, that's fine, you have cameras doing it your way - but don't tell me every camera should be like that.

I didn't.

You mean his choice to bash Pentax and DSLRs in general, by spreading falsehoods about their capabilities. Yes, you made it thoroughly clear that you're supportive of that.

Enough now! You sent a "tip", which more or less told thomass to STFU. That's not something we want to see here. If all you still see in his post is "fake news!!!1!" then come up with facts and argue or discuss properly. Period. But stop acting like a cry baby whose favorite toy was insulted. Sorry to be so harsh, but you stubbornly ignore any more subtle ways obviously. The "tip" you got in return was meant in this (and this only) way. If in exchange you start accusing me now, you didn't get the message.