02-24-2024, 01:57 PM
(02-21-2024, 03:49 AM)mariahcarey Wrote: Both lenses are capable of producing excellent image quality, but the EF 35mm f/1.4 may have a slight edge in terms of sharpness and overall optical performance, especially at wider apertures. However, the differences may not be noticeable in real-world shooting situations for many photographers.
Yes, that is basically what all the reviews say.
Having said that, apart from the views I used to have on 35 mm FL lenses, I got the 24L, basically because the 35Ls never convinced me like the 24Ls did. For my shooting style they felt better. The exception became the RF 35 F/1.8, basically at first because I could get it at a very good price, and because it is so light. I like it a lot more than I ever thought I would, however.
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....