Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX)
#7
Quote:Interesting, because over here the Tamron is considerably more expensive (Nikon around 475 EUR, Tamron closer to 700 EUR).

But yes, the VC maybe adds the "excitement" I was missing. But as Klaus' review shows, the lens doesn't really impress in other regards.

 


Sure Smile And the 35 VC, too, I will likely order it soon.


However, next stop: the AF-S 20/1.8, then Tamron 15-30 VC. And I got the AF-S 24/1.8 today Smile


-- Markus
 

Same in Switzerland: Nikkor 488.-, Tamron 693.- 

 

20 francs more is a Sigma without OS but with f/1.4

 

AF-S 20/1.8? I'd be interested how the Sigma 20/1.4 would stand against. Shall I send you mine?  Smile  Good you're back!
  


Messages In This Thread
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 02-29-2016, 08:37 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by JJ_SO - 02-29-2016, 10:06 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 02-29-2016, 10:45 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 02-29-2016, 12:53 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 02-29-2016, 02:16 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 02-29-2016, 03:21 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 G (on FX) - by davidmanze - 03-02-2016, 08:19 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)