04-08-2016, 12:28 PM
Quote:4 aspheres in a zoom. What a time to be alive.
Bokeh ...
FE 50/1.8, FE 70-300/4.5-5.6, RX10III
|
04-08-2016, 12:28 PM
Quote:4 aspheres in a zoom. What a time to be alive. Bokeh ...
04-08-2016, 01:06 PM
Quote:Bokeh ...https://fstoppers.com/originals/first-ha...ens-122829 The bokeh looks pretty good there actually, even if it has 4 aspheres? Contrary to some other Sony lenses with aspheres which show very big bokeh short comings like the Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm f2.8 ZA SSM, or the Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 16-35mm f2.8 ZA SSM.
04-08-2016, 01:06 PM
Quote:Bokeh ...I kinda doubt that the bokeh aficionados are going to even look at this lens because "you can't get any boken out of a 4.5-5.6 lens!" Rather it's an utilitarian design - but whether it's going to stand out that much (quality-wise) remains to be seen. I like my Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 VC but don't really "love" it - it has some obvious shortcomings (that are forgivable for a $200 lens though). Quote:https://fstoppers.com/originals/first-ha...ens-122829 This is what the guy says in the review "The out-of-focus areas while shooting wide open with this lens are not all that great. Backgrounds tend to get blotchy and a little bit busy with edges rather than melt away. " Of course, we'll look at this ... ;-) Regarding those Zeiss lenses ... wide and ultra-wide zoom lenses ... com'on ... how many lenses in these categories have a good bokeh really.
04-09-2016, 06:26 AM
The Canon and Nikon ones not that bad as the Sony ("Zeiss") ones.... Remember that in your review of the 24-70 you found it to have exceptionally bad bokeh issues at certain focus distance?
04-09-2016, 08:38 AM
Quote:The Canon and Nikon ones not that bad as the Sony ("Zeiss") ones.... Remember that in your review of the 24-70 you found it to have exceptionally bad bokeh issues at certain focus distance? To date, few Sony/Zeiss lenses impressed. Correct. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |