08-22-2015, 09:16 AM
And the new one gets the first delays. I wonder if Nikon underestimated the demand or did manage to make another design flaw?
Bojan, did you also take a closer look at the VR? On the new 300/4 PF E it turned out to be a big flaw and still is. Some exposure times will cause motion blur. I still want to compare that lens and the Sigma Sports in terms of VR. Although Sigma has to pay a penalty for copying the Nikon VR it appears theirs is doing the better job.
So maybe the same could be with Tamron's and Nikon's versions of 24-70? I don't want to blame Nikon but at this price it has to be the best and for what I see, I don't find any good reason to pay three times what I paid for the 24-105/4 which is superb in terms of VR.
Bojan, did you also take a closer look at the VR? On the new 300/4 PF E it turned out to be a big flaw and still is. Some exposure times will cause motion blur. I still want to compare that lens and the Sigma Sports in terms of VR. Although Sigma has to pay a penalty for copying the Nikon VR it appears theirs is doing the better job.
So maybe the same could be with Tamron's and Nikon's versions of 24-70? I don't want to blame Nikon but at this price it has to be the best and for what I see, I don't find any good reason to pay three times what I paid for the 24-105/4 which is superb in terms of VR.