01-12-2015, 01:51 PM
I'm no software engineer but I would not categorize OpenSource as "most ridiculous". Think of Mozilla, Firefox, OpenOffice, all Linuxes - it's good to have options and it's also good to move away from the old super-expensive mainframes, aministrated only by Super-Checkers. OpenSource has no exclusivity on wrong decisions in software development.
But I would expect a good service from profit-organisations - I understand if I play around with half ready half buggy OpenSource stuff, I have to pay my own efforts and need to understand a lot. If I already paid for software, I expect good service in malfunctions, I expect good manuals and I expect somebody is listening what I want. This is quite often happening . But in case of Adobe or Apple or Micrososft - those players are very far away from consumers wishes and think they know better what we need.
Alright.
Now, please could somebody (no, Brightcolours, this question is not for you, sorry) tell me if I should stay with the already ordered Sigma 150-600 Sports or give this 300/4 PF E a go? What? "Get both, you fool!" - that'd be coward's advice, sorry... Do I benefit more of variable FL or lightweight?
But I would expect a good service from profit-organisations - I understand if I play around with half ready half buggy OpenSource stuff, I have to pay my own efforts and need to understand a lot. If I already paid for software, I expect good service in malfunctions, I expect good manuals and I expect somebody is listening what I want. This is quite often happening . But in case of Adobe or Apple or Micrososft - those players are very far away from consumers wishes and think they know better what we need.
Alright.
Now, please could somebody (no, Brightcolours, this question is not for you, sorry) tell me if I should stay with the already ordered Sigma 150-600 Sports or give this 300/4 PF E a go? What? "Get both, you fool!" - that'd be coward's advice, sorry... Do I benefit more of variable FL or lightweight?