Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To EZ or not to EZ (14-42 lenses)
#3
Quote:Sure, it'll be tested. It is just a matter of priorities.

However, the EZ doesn't seem to be that great.


Hi Klaus


Tranks for the reply. What I have seen it seems optically comparable (some questions about doggy samples out in the wild) to the MK IIR which you have reviewed. The key question to me is wobble, internal vibrations - the general build quality. Human muscle power allows for tighter assembly than battery power driven motors.


I actually used the wobbly MK I quite a bit. A better spec-ed lens wouldn't have gone all those places due to weight and size.


Do you (or Sebbi for that matter) have a sample or is it further down the pipeline?
enjoy
  


Messages In This Thread
To EZ or not to EZ (14-42 lenses) - by joachim - 09-08-2014, 06:13 AM
To EZ or not to EZ (14-42 lenses) - by Klaus - 09-14-2014, 01:15 AM
To EZ or not to EZ (14-42 lenses) - by joachim - 09-14-2014, 08:40 AM
To EZ or not to EZ (14-42 lenses) - by Klaus - 09-14-2014, 09:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)