Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
V3
#9
Quote:Yada yada, BC, I probably would have thought you're ill if you hadn't posted  B)

 

You're right, those are not in this class. Unless I don't make clear "this class" to me is "pricy little gadgets with a lens in front, no point and shoot, no DSLR and tons of high tech onboard and a screen with no access to a photo because all is needed for NASA like menus". Did I forget something? Ah, yes, tiny batteries  Rolleyes Anyway, compared to a Leica it's dirt cheap. It's fantastic how those big players don't come out with something cool and affordable in that size. Who knows how long Nikon will manufacture CX-size things?
So the "class" just means compact and not cheap, right? Not about whether it has changable lenses or a fixed lens, not about sensor size, not about zoom lens or single focal length prime, not about PD AF or not, and so on.

 

Which big players don't come out with something cool and affordable? The biggest players are Nikon and Canon. I agree that the Nikon 1 series and the Canon EOS M are not the coolest cameras around. Leica is a small player with a small player infrastructure.
  


Messages In This Thread
V3 - by alban - 03-26-2014, 04:13 PM
V3 - by Klaus - 03-27-2014, 09:28 AM
V3 - by alban - 03-27-2014, 10:13 AM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 03-27-2014, 11:14 AM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 03-27-2014, 01:22 PM
V3 - by Guest - 03-27-2014, 05:53 PM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 03-27-2014, 07:36 PM
V3 - by popo - 03-27-2014, 07:39 PM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 03-28-2014, 01:31 PM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 04-01-2014, 05:26 PM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 04-02-2014, 10:04 AM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 04-02-2014, 10:07 PM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 04-03-2014, 09:00 AM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 04-03-2014, 10:36 AM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 04-03-2014, 11:21 AM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 04-03-2014, 07:14 PM
V3 - by Brightcolours - 04-03-2014, 07:58 PM
V3 - by JJ_SO - 04-03-2014, 08:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)