10-01-2013, 12:36 PM
Interesting; so with the sigma you get +1 fstop and higher resolution but with the canon you get IS and nicer bokeh; all for the same price 
And then there is the zeiss with similar performance to the canon (but slightly higher CA) and a bit more expensive than both the canon/sigma - i won't bother mentioning the zeiss 35f1.4 which is an arm and a leg but probably has nicer bokeh than the sigma.;
-
Well I think the 35mm is well covered. So how's the fuji 55-200 looking ?
And then there is the zeiss with similar performance to the canon (but slightly higher CA) and a bit more expensive than both the canon/sigma - i won't bother mentioning the zeiss 35f1.4 which is an arm and a leg but probably has nicer bokeh than the sigma.;-
Well I think the 35mm is well covered. So how's the fuji 55-200 looking ?