10-25-2017, 08:32 AM
I'd say, it's no problem to find out - but some reasons I could imagine to be difficult for a clear result:
It's a difference of 2 fps if you use it with or without battery grip AND stronger EN-EL18bbattery. 2 addiitonal files per second can fill up the buffer quicker, as writing speed stays the same. The same if you use CL shooting mode. Slower filling, more pcitures to write.
If you need an overview: In the manual, page 269, "Capacity of buffer memory", Nikon states 51 RAW 14 bit losless with battery EN-EL15a (no matter with or without grip - the battery has a lower voltage, I assume) or 29 with EN-EL18b (fully charged, I think). The more compressed and the less bits color depth, the more frames are needed to fill up the buffer - so, processing speed is not critical, writing speed is.
What brings me to the question which kind and type of memeory card Matt used? Nikon again specs it like Sony QD-64E XQD, 100 ISO. Bigger cards, slower cards, high frequently used cards (instead of a new one) are also slower in writing.
It's a difference of 2 fps if you use it with or without battery grip AND stronger EN-EL18bbattery. 2 addiitonal files per second can fill up the buffer quicker, as writing speed stays the same. The same if you use CL shooting mode. Slower filling, more pcitures to write.
If you need an overview: In the manual, page 269, "Capacity of buffer memory", Nikon states 51 RAW 14 bit losless with battery EN-EL15a (no matter with or without grip - the battery has a lower voltage, I assume) or 29 with EN-EL18b (fully charged, I think). The more compressed and the less bits color depth, the more frames are needed to fill up the buffer - so, processing speed is not critical, writing speed is.
What brings me to the question which kind and type of memeory card Matt used? Nikon again specs it like Sony QD-64E XQD, 100 ISO. Bigger cards, slower cards, high frequently used cards (instead of a new one) are also slower in writing.