11-19-2012, 01:23 PM
I thought olympus prices were a bit high on some of their newer lenses; but when I look at canon... at least olympus lenses are for the most part quite good optically (though the 17f1.8 is turning out to be not in the same league as the 45,60 and 75).
-
I actually don't take quite so many pictures these days but I think I would go with fuji (if they can improve the evf) over canon. 10 years or even 5 years ago canon was a real bargin (esp compared to nikon) in the us; though I will admit the comments on canon (and olympus) service is stellar in the us; nikon on the other hand I hear nothing but bad things. I know the picture is different in europe. I wonder if fuji has decent service in the us.
-
I like the e-m5; esp the small size but I do think (from images I've seen - not first hand) fuji does a better job.
-
I actually don't take quite so many pictures these days but I think I would go with fuji (if they can improve the evf) over canon. 10 years or even 5 years ago canon was a real bargin (esp compared to nikon) in the us; though I will admit the comments on canon (and olympus) service is stellar in the us; nikon on the other hand I hear nothing but bad things. I know the picture is different in europe. I wonder if fuji has decent service in the us.
-
I like the e-m5; esp the small size but I do think (from images I've seen - not first hand) fuji does a better job.