06-26-2012, 08:18 PM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1340741603' post='19155']
That much better on FX than on DX? How come? I remember the results of my dream lens - Sigma 85mm - being similar but not to that degree. I understand that sensor density comes into play but most earlier reviews indicated a different behaviour - just worse borders/corners on FX without such quirks.
[/quote]
First of all thanks for the review and your efforts!
But then there is the same question over here. Any explanations for the big difference wide open between FX and DX? Other lenses (e.g. 14-24, 85 1.8g) are more comparable (on a qualitative level of course). Makes me wonder how it performs on a D800...
Best regards.
That much better on FX than on DX? How come? I remember the results of my dream lens - Sigma 85mm - being similar but not to that degree. I understand that sensor density comes into play but most earlier reviews indicated a different behaviour - just worse borders/corners on FX without such quirks.
[/quote]
First of all thanks for the review and your efforts!
But then there is the same question over here. Any explanations for the big difference wide open between FX and DX? Other lenses (e.g. 14-24, 85 1.8g) are more comparable (on a qualitative level of course). Makes me wonder how it performs on a D800...
Best regards.