[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1333268125' post='17247']
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
Actually I think it's viable to offer ...
a ) a nano-mirrorless (Q)
b ) a flexible mirrorless (GXR)
c ) APS-C DSLRs with a mirrorless and classic approach
The actual implementation could be debatable, of course.
I got the impression that at least the local Pentax fellows liked the K-01. Persoanlly I consider the SLT concept to be more convincing but that's me.
I'm curious when the GXR will evolve to its next evolutionary step. It is about time.
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[/quote]
Actually I think it's viable to offer ...
a ) a nano-mirrorless (Q)
b ) a flexible mirrorless (GXR)
c ) APS-C DSLRs with a mirrorless and classic approach
The actual implementation could be debatable, of course.
I got the impression that at least the local Pentax fellows liked the K-01. Persoanlly I consider the SLT concept to be more convincing but that's me.
I'm curious when the GXR will evolve to its next evolutionary step. It is about time.