06-14-2017, 02:41 PM
What I found quite interesting is that although the MF image shows slightly more detail, the MFT image shows better contrast ....
Of course it is hard to say whether this is caused by differences in processing, but at first glance it looks like better microcontrast.
Also, the MFT camera used is a 16MP version. AFAIK, and IME, the latest, 20MP bodies are better in many respects; the sensors are better.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....