Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MF vs MFT - interesting :)
#5
One picture with f/16 and the other with f/5.6 - diffraction doens't give a shit about equivalence. Reducing the lens' resolution by stopping down like mad comes at a price.- 

 

"Shows slightly more detail..." haha, with a camera with a solid shutter slap and 2 seconds exposure time. Sorry, this trick only works in that kind of dull light. I came to very different results than this guy when I compared the Fuji GFx50 with a Nikon D810 and that was not 2.5× more Pixels.

  


Messages In This Thread
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by wim - 06-13-2017, 04:48 PM
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by mike - 06-14-2017, 02:21 AM
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by borisbg - 06-14-2017, 04:40 AM
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by wim - 06-14-2017, 02:41 PM
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by JJ_SO - 06-14-2017, 03:38 PM
MF vs MFT - interesting :) - by Brightcolours - 06-14-2017, 06:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)