01-23-2012, 10:59 PM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1327357666' post='15173']
The 30mm was reviewed on slrgear. They also thought the corners are weak.
With the Zeiss, which Adapter are you using? I am suspicious of that semi-transp mirror. Also I remember you writing about funnies when using adapters on the Oly E-620. Did you ever understand those?
[/quote]
slrgear used the NEX 5. I will do another test on the 5 as well and I suspect that the results will be substantially better here. We are talking about rather dismal corners which isn't quite reflected in the slrgear test.
The ZA 85mm was tested using the LA-EA1 - not EA2 - thus without a potentially disturbing mirror. I did a reference test with the LA-EA2 actually but the results were only marginally worse (less than 5%).
There was something with the E-620. I suspect that the in-body IS had something to do with it. We had problems with the in-body IS on the E-P1 and E-PL3 as well. The Pentax K5 has also effects here - the sensor isn't really locked without IS but just kept in position.
The 30mm was reviewed on slrgear. They also thought the corners are weak.
With the Zeiss, which Adapter are you using? I am suspicious of that semi-transp mirror. Also I remember you writing about funnies when using adapters on the Oly E-620. Did you ever understand those?
[/quote]
slrgear used the NEX 5. I will do another test on the 5 as well and I suspect that the results will be substantially better here. We are talking about rather dismal corners which isn't quite reflected in the slrgear test.
The ZA 85mm was tested using the LA-EA1 - not EA2 - thus without a potentially disturbing mirror. I did a reference test with the LA-EA2 actually but the results were only marginally worse (less than 5%).
There was something with the E-620. I suspect that the in-body IS had something to do with it. We had problems with the in-body IS on the E-P1 and E-PL3 as well. The Pentax K5 has also effects here - the sensor isn't really locked without IS but just kept in position.