[Guest]

Markus, assuming that the current results are more representative for the actual lens population (which I don't doubt), it's good that you redid the tests. But I believe that you should mention somewhere in the reviews that this was your second copy, and that the results of the first were withdrawn because they were subpar. That's how Klaus does it in his tests. The addition of the word "revised" is a bit cryptic; and to me it gives the impression that your test method or your interpretation of the results was bad, while in fact it was not you.