10-27-2011, 09:30 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1319578094' post='12491']
No surprises compared to the earlier D200-based review: not bad, but the AF-S DX 16-85 VR offers more value for less money.
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikk...fs1635vrdx
-- Markus
[/quote]
Nice test - thanks again.
I do find this lens a bit disappointing, compared to it's pro spec siblings
To me, the old 17 - 55mm F/2.8 is more attractive for DX, albeit at a higher price
But yer pays yer money and.......
No surprises compared to the earlier D200-based review: not bad, but the AF-S DX 16-85 VR offers more value for less money.
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikk...fs1635vrdx
-- Markus
[/quote]
Nice test - thanks again.
I do find this lens a bit disappointing, compared to it's pro spec siblings
To me, the old 17 - 55mm F/2.8 is more attractive for DX, albeit at a higher price
But yer pays yer money and.......