Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Micro Nikkor AF-S DX 40mm f/2.8 G
#21
3cm. WOW! That's very close. You're likely to shadow the object.
#22
3cm? I wont complain about the 42mm working distance of the MPE-65 again! Then again that does have a longer focal length...
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
#23
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1316540062' post='11668']

You're likely to shadow the object.

[/quote]



Yep. But not only at 1:1. With normal light (from behind) the shadow becomes an issue a lot earlier.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#24
I updated the review, there's now a small section dealing with working distance and the shadow the hood may cast on the first page of the review.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#25
Thank you.
#26
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316540704' post='11670']

Yep. But not only at 1:1. With normal light (from behind) the shadow becomes an issue a lot earlier.



-- Markus

[/quote]

Light from the side is more attractive anyway <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



Does the Tokina 35mm f2.8 extend as much? Its front element is recessed, so it has less need of the hood.
#27
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1316606962' post='11706']

Does the Tokina 35mm f2.8 extend as much? Its front element is recessed, so it has less need of the hood.

[/quote]



It extends considerably, too, but its MFD is even closer (14 cm). So, the working distance might be shorter than the Nikkor's. Unfortunately I can't measure it anymore, the lens is already gone.



The Tokina's front lens however remains deeply recessed, even at 1:1. That reduces the need for a large hood. In fact, the frontmost part of the inner lens tube is actually the hood ... a small metal ring, that can even be removed (an thus marginally increases the working distance).



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#28
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316548532' post='11671']

I updated the review, there's now a small section dealing with working distance and the shadow the hood may cast on the first page of the review.



-- Markus

[/quote]



Thanks
#29
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1315976383' post='11579']

The Tokina is the next DX review to be published. Not sure yet when that is going to happen, though.

[/quote]



What happened to this review or to the lens? You published plenty of other DX reviews.
#30
[quote name='ThomasD' timestamp='1318315774' post='12272']

What happened to this review or to the lens? You published plenty of other DX reviews.

[/quote]



Yes, sorry. Slight shift of priorities <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' /> Don't worry, it's still on the list.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)