06-17-2011, 01:21 PM
Thanks Markus.
But I don't understand the results.
I compared them to those of the AF-S 16-85 and the 18-105 seems to be just as good or better on the charts.
But my friend owns the 18-105 and I have the 16-85 and we compared a while ago. We both can't fight the feeling that the 16-85 produces the better results.
In your test you rate the optical quality of the 16-85 4 stars, but the 18-105 only 3.
How does that fit?
But I don't understand the results.
I compared them to those of the AF-S 16-85 and the 18-105 seems to be just as good or better on the charts.
But my friend owns the 18-105 and I have the 16-85 and we compared a while ago. We both can't fight the feeling that the 16-85 produces the better results.
In your test you rate the optical quality of the 16-85 4 stars, but the 18-105 only 3.
How does that fit?