05-17-2011, 04:59 PM
[quote name='oneguy' timestamp='1305649737' post='8419']
Yes, it's still sharper from F2.8 and up than both.[/quote]
Can we maybe agree to a more practical conclusion: all three are great at f/2.8 and beyond.
[quote name='oneguy' timestamp='1305649737' post='8419']
They don't have a cheap F2.8 85mm lens.
[/quote]
Interesting. When the 85 SAM was introduced, a question you heard quite often was: who's supposed to buy this? Mainly because it is so slow.
Canon and Nikon both have quite affordable f/1.8 primes. Sony has an even more affordable f/2.8, but no f/1.8
Where's the whole again?
-- Markus
Yes, it's still sharper from F2.8 and up than both.[/quote]
Can we maybe agree to a more practical conclusion: all three are great at f/2.8 and beyond.
[quote name='oneguy' timestamp='1305649737' post='8419']
They don't have a cheap F2.8 85mm lens.
[/quote]
Interesting. When the 85 SAM was introduced, a question you heard quite often was: who's supposed to buy this? Mainly because it is so slow.
Canon and Nikon both have quite affordable f/1.8 primes. Sony has an even more affordable f/2.8, but no f/1.8
Where's the whole again?
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com