05-17-2011, 10:11 PM
Guys, have you all missed the smiley? Here's a reminder.
[quote name='Bare' timestamp='1305619848' post='8400']
And Sony answered with 85 F2.8. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> [/quote]
For god sake, it was only a joke! Why wasn't it clear enough? Think about this. Apart from FL these lenses have nothing in common. Heck, you can't even mount them on the same camera.
So, can we please end this silly debate with Markus' conclusion?
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1305651552' post='8424']
Can we maybe agree to a more practical conclusion: all three are great at f/2.8 and beyond.[/quote]
Kids, we all know what Klaus always says about comparing MFT results from different systems, don't we? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='Bare' timestamp='1305619848' post='8400']
And Sony answered with 85 F2.8. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='

For god sake, it was only a joke! Why wasn't it clear enough? Think about this. Apart from FL these lenses have nothing in common. Heck, you can't even mount them on the same camera.
So, can we please end this silly debate with Markus' conclusion?
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1305651552' post='8424']
Can we maybe agree to a more practical conclusion: all three are great at f/2.8 and beyond.[/quote]
Kids, we all know what Klaus always says about comparing MFT results from different systems, don't we? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
