03-30-2011, 08:09 PM
[quote name='x_holger' timestamp='1301510387' post='7235']
So sorry for my criticism, but in this case the photozone review didn't impress me.
[/quote]
Why do we need to indicate better resolution data than lenstip ? We are not in a contest to deliver the most pleasing result - this is about formal testing and not wishful thinking. We are talking about a f/0.95 aperture here and it's absolutely superb what Cosina was capable to delivering at this setting. Expecting anything better than that isn't overly realistic at such a focal length. We didn't see a better performance from the Canon 50mm f/1.2 USM L either just to give you an example from the other side of the fence. There are numerous test results from f/1.4 lenses which comply with the general trend.
So sorry for my criticism, but in this case the photozone review didn't impress me.
[/quote]
Why do we need to indicate better resolution data than lenstip ? We are not in a contest to deliver the most pleasing result - this is about formal testing and not wishful thinking. We are talking about a f/0.95 aperture here and it's absolutely superb what Cosina was capable to delivering at this setting. Expecting anything better than that isn't overly realistic at such a focal length. We didn't see a better performance from the Canon 50mm f/1.2 USM L either just to give you an example from the other side of the fence. There are numerous test results from f/1.4 lenses which comply with the general trend.