03-23-2011, 02:18 PM
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1300886465' post='7044']
Are you sure about that? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
I am.. Not sure why it is though. At base-ISO the K5 has very low shadow noise (which means it does well in DR-measurements), but at higher ISO settings, that advantage disappears somehow. If you compare for instance a Canon 60D with a D7000 or K5 at higher ISO settings, the Canon is comparable yet retains more detail.
I guess the amplification stage is not as clean?
Are you sure about that? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[/quote]
I am.. Not sure why it is though. At base-ISO the K5 has very low shadow noise (which means it does well in DR-measurements), but at higher ISO settings, that advantage disappears somehow. If you compare for instance a Canon 60D with a D7000 or K5 at higher ISO settings, the Canon is comparable yet retains more detail.
I guess the amplification stage is not as clean?