Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Zeiss ZF Distagon T* 21mm f/2.8 (DX)
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1295949621' post='5747']

Hi Markus nice test... but I have a little trouble to understand the policy behind the testing priority.[/quote]

Well, there is no policy, actually <img src='<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' /> It just happened that there are some D200 based reviews which have been in an almost but not quite finished state for quite a while. Some I simply cancelled, some I wanted to finish and definitely publish before the first D7000 review is published.

The ZF 21 will of course also be reviewed on the D3x. In fact, the review is basically done and only needs some polishing.

[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1295949621' post='5747']

On the other hand the 28-300 has not been tested at all yet, shouldnt the priority on that lens have been higher?


It has been tested, I'm at this very moment doing the PS work for the charts <img src='<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />

-- Markus

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1295983681' post='5760']

No, you're not, and thanks for the hint. I tried to find different words than "diffraction kicking in" which has been used so often, but the phrase chosen was not the best choice.

Just changed it to "...from wide open down to f/11 (where diffraction already reduces resolution)." Better?

-- Markus


All fine with me. <img src='<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)