11-28-2010, 05:27 AM
[quote name='allanmb' timestamp='1290511508' post='4355']
My main reason would be the interface on the camera and the LCD screen - the original 5D was horrible for those but I just don't think they are worth £1000 to me (yes its higher resolution, and does movies, has higher ISO etc. but I wouldn't take advantage of those too much).
[/quote]
If I were you, my main concern would be the mirror boxes in the old 5Ds which I've heard some say fall off after they're used a bit.
Also, if the higher resolution, higher ISOs or the movies don't matter to you, I'm not sure why you'd want to go full frame in the first place. There is ofcourse shallower DOF but you can never have ISOs too high (or noise too low) <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
Btw, congratulations on your new arrivals <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
My main reason would be the interface on the camera and the LCD screen - the original 5D was horrible for those but I just don't think they are worth £1000 to me (yes its higher resolution, and does movies, has higher ISO etc. but I wouldn't take advantage of those too much).
[/quote]
If I were you, my main concern would be the mirror boxes in the old 5Ds which I've heard some say fall off after they're used a bit.
Also, if the higher resolution, higher ISOs or the movies don't matter to you, I'm not sure why you'd want to go full frame in the first place. There is ofcourse shallower DOF but you can never have ISOs too high (or noise too low) <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
Btw, congratulations on your new arrivals <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW